Tuesday, May 26, 2009

5.26.09 - radiation #6 and finally a doctor i really like

had radiation #6 today, then met with dr. rost. he's the medical director of radiation oncology and he's my doc. there is something about him that is so disarming and so reassuring and so down to earth. there is no pretentiousness about him at all. the only other doctor i've met since my ordeal began that i trusted and felt safe with was dr. mark moasser at UCSF. the two medical oncologists that i'm stuck with here because of insurance are absolute...well, we don't need to go into that again. i've already raked them over the coals in this blog and i hate thinking about them. i talked to dr. rost about them a little bit today, told him i think they should be run out of town (to say the least). i like dr. rost's body language and the way he listens and responds. it's so shocking and so wonderful to have a doctor here that i like and trust.

i asked him what he thought about genetic testing. i assumed that because my birth mother and grandmother died of breast cancer that spread to the bone, he'd say i needed it, and if i was positive for the BRCA genes, then i'd need to have an oopherectomy. but he said no, that because i'm postmenopausal, it's not necessary. he expressed more thoughts about it, but bottom line is that he doesn't recommend it. no one else has told me that before.

then we talked about scans. he said i'd have a PET scan of my body six months after the end of chemo, which means november. (my idiotic med onc said i'd only need chest x-rays and bloodwork every three months, that i won't have any scans at all. i'm ignoring him completely and only listening to rost. rost agreed the chest x-rays are unnecessary.) he said they don't do a scan of the brain. i asked why, since i've read that one of the main places breast cancer comes back is the brain. he said that if had cancer spread to the brain, we'd know it - headaches and i'd act strange. then he said, "but in your case that would be hard to know," which totally cracked me up! he's got me figured out.

i told dr. rost how much i like having him as my doctor and that he seems like a teddy bear. i hope that didn't insult him. i meant it in the best way possible. he's got the most adorable face and smile, and he's very teddy bearish in a nice hugable sort of way.

i am so enormously relieved to have a doctor i like and trust, and so encouraged by the thought that i might not have to have the genetic testing and oopherectomy, i sat in my car and cried and cried. it felt good.

11 comments:

Joy said...

As a TNBC sister, I’ve been following your journey with great interest. I’m just so happy that you have a great doctor to see you through this last stage of your treatment.

I start radiation therapy next week, and I’m really worried how my skin will take the 33 treatments + boosts. Can I ask what Dr. Rost recommended in the way of skin lotions or other supplements?

Today, I turned down participating in the 3-year bisphosphonates trial. I can only have faith that I’ve made the right decision.

Sending you much love and healing power.

Joy

deborah d. lattimore said...
This post has been removed by the author.
deborah d. lattimore said...

dear joy, so glad that you wrote! rost recommends aquaphor two times a day. he said i can put it on up to 2 hours before radiation. my appt is always at 2:15, but i don't put it on in the mornings because it's very thick and hasn't stays on a long time, and i just don't want anything on my chest area during radiation. so i put it on right after radiation and again at night after my bath. he said aloe vera gel (100% clear) is good to use if you have itching. i have itching, but it's not because of the radiation; it's because of the mastectomy. it's a phantom itching of the breast - really annoying.

i also decided not to take zometa, a biophosphenate. i'm too freaked out by the risk of osteonecrosis. i asked rost about that today and he said the decision is fine since my chances of recurrence are down to about 5% anyway. i think if my chances were very high, i'd go ahead with the zometa. but i saw photos of osteonecrosis, and that was all i needed in order to make my decision. what biophosphenate would the trial be using?

are you going to have tomotherapy or regular linear accelerator? rost told me that there is minimal skin reaction with tomotherapy. also said that women who have large breasts have more side effects because skin reaction is worse under a breast or wherever a breast touches the skin.

xoxox

Anonymous said...

I'm glad you found a doctor you like. There is nothing like being sick and at the mercy of hateful/no personality doctors or nurses.....I hope these treatments fly by fast for you,

Donna

Sara Williams said...

Glad you have a doctor you like and trust, makes a HUGE difference. I am so lucky to live in the UK where we have the NHS. I will be given creams and lotions when I start radiation. Thank you for the NHS xxxx

deborah d. lattimore said...

dear donna and sara, thank you! sara, i wish we had NHS. but now that we finally have a president with a brain and a heart, maybe we'll be headed in that direction.
xoxo

The Cebulas said...

Glad to hear you finally have a dr you can trust. Didn't know that about tha BRCA, one less thing to worry for you.

deborah d. lattimore said...

dear cebulas, thank you! i still feel like i have research to do about the genetic testing. i've been told by doctors, by my patient advocate, and by a genetic counselor that it doesn't matter if a woman is postmenopausal, she can still get ovarian cancer if she's positive for BRCA. so as much as i hope dr. rost is right, i just need to really KNOW. so i'm meeting with another genetic counselor and still asking questions everywhere. my stepmother had breast cancer and died 13 years later of ovarian cancer, and i saw what a horrible death ovarian cancer is. i really don't want to put my kids through that. xoxo

The Cebulas said...

Deb, one thing to think about is the possiblity to pass such gene to your children. If by any chance you were to find out that you are BRCA +, could you have passed those genes to your children even though they're boys? That's something to think about also wether you or your children would want that info.

deborah d. lattimore said...

dear cebulas, my sons and i have talked about that issue. i spoke with dr. rost about it too. i told him that it was my understanding that sons of a mother who tests positive for BRCA have an increased risk of pancreatic and prostate cancer, but he said there's just no way to determine that. my sons said that whether or not i get the test, they are still going to be taking care of themselves and getting appropriate tests at the right age, and it would not influence their decision to have or not have children. but one genetic counselor told me that we never know what advances are going to be made in the future, of course, and if my sons have the information about the results of my BRCA test, it could help them in the future in ways we just can't predict. so i'm mulling that over. it's frustrating when genetic counselors, who really should be the last word in this, disagree on so many things! i've talked to two of them so far, and they don't agree about whether i should take the test. so i have more investigating to do!

The Cebulas said...

You seem to have been doing your researches on the subject! Good for you, we need to be the first one to take care of our health.